Bio Fuels – Avoiding Unintended Environmental Consequences

One of the many ag news sources I digest (Get it?) recently reported that many dairymen throughout the country are closing down their dairies, selling the cows, and preparing to plant corn and soybeans instead. This is largely due to the fact that dairy work is long, hard and arduous, and the lure of money from the ethanol market seems like a much better gig. It is a shift that can make a lot of sense, but look for it to have an effect on milk, and other dairy prices. This brings me to my point. The ripple effect in economy and environment.

This is often very tricky and unpredictable, particularly with such volatile industries, but it is worth spending a little time in consideration, particularly since it could bring about some unintended consequences, and perhaps, some inconvenient truths.

Nowhere is this more evident than in the movement away from fossil fuels, and toward bio fuels.

I like the idea of growing our fuels. It would be great for the environment, at least to a point. Let me explain my concern.

If in the process of raising the raw materials for this change, we can avoid creating new environmental problems, it will be not only great, but bordering on the miraculous! One of the things we will need to deal with is the question of erosion. The ethanol market will, without a doubt, draw many people into farming, most of whom will have little interest in maintaining environmental integrity. Can we accomplish this without producing a new “dust bowl?”

What if we find that production will be insufficient for our needs due to drought or flooding, after we have become dependent on these new methods? Will we then turn to methanol production and suffer the effects of billions of people stripping the forests and pastures in order to drive.

What will happen if so many of our farmers ranchers and dairymen migrate to ethanol production, and away from food production that it affects the prices and availability of food adversely? Great, we have fuel to get to the store, but no food to buy when we get there!

I am not saying that bio fuels are not the answer.

When coupled with other technologies and innovations, including solar technology, storage cell improvements, better ways to harness wind and kinetic energy, more efficient power generation and application, hydrogen power, and many others, all working in tandem, great progress can be made. We need to make sure that we do not put all our eggs in one basket, as we seemingly have done with fossil fuels. We also need to make sure that we are prepared to deal with the different set of consequences that are possible with any emerging technology.

James Burns is a licensed pest control professional, has been a Certified Professional Turfgrass Manager for more than 16 years, has a lifetime of experience in horticulture and agriculture, and is the owner of Rational Environmental Solutions, an IPM based pest control company in East Texas. He also has many helpful gardening tips at http://www.texpest.com, and writes on environmental and social issues from http://www.rationalenvironmentalsolutions.com

Biomass Gasifier Stove

Biomass Gasifier Stove Alexis Belonio’s Ingenuity Designed and developed to provide households with affordable, efficient, and convenient cooking device that produces gaseous flame using rice husk and/or other assortment of biomass materials as input fuel. A take off from direct burning output of traditional stoves; in contrast to this new trend of producing smokeless and bluish quality of flame by gasification process.

Biofuels That Provide Optional Sources of Power

Biofuels tend to be generated by transforming natural and organic substance into energy resources with regard to providing power for our modern society. Many of these biofuels may be a replacement power source for the classic fuels which we at the present time rely on. The biofuels group does include under its aegis alcohol and types of crops which include sugar cane, along with vegetable and cereal oils. Nevertheless, not every alcohol products will be intended to be utilized as a form of fuel. The International Energy Agency (IEA) informs us that ethanol may make up around ten percent of the earth’s available petrol by 2025, climbing towards thirty percent by 2050. Currently, the proportion figure is two percent.

Nevertheless, we’ve got a considerable ways to go to perfect and make economic and functional these biofuels which we are exploring. A report by Oregon State University attests this. We’ve yet to produce biofuels which are as energy-efficient as fuel produced from petroleum. Energy efficiency is a measurement of the quantity of practical energy for our desired uses comes from a specified quantity of input energy. (Absolutely nothing that the human race has actually employed has produced greater energy from end result than coming from just what the required input was. Exactly what has been essential is the transformation; the resultant energy is exactly what is required for our requirements, whilst the input energy is simply the effort it requires to generate the end-product.) The OSU study found cereal-derived alcohol to generally be no more than 20% energy-efficient (fuel produced from petroleum is actually 75% energy-efficient). Biodiesel gasoline or diesel was initially recorded around 69% energy-efficient. However, the research managed to find one particular positive: cellulose-derived alcohol was recorded at 85% energy-efficient, and that is considerably greater than that of the extremely efficient nuclear energy.

Lately, oil futures have been declining on the New York Stock Market, as experts from a number of different nations are forecasting a rise in biofuel supply which may counterbalance the importance of oil and gas, decreasing crude oil values on the world-wide market to $ 40 per barrel. The Chicago Stock Market features a grain futures market that is beginning to provide alternative investment activity from the oil futures in New York, since traders are certainly anticipating greater profitability to start originating from biofuels. Certainly, it’s forecasted by a cohort of analysts that biofuels will be providing seven percent for the whole entire planet’s transportation energy sources by the year 2030. One particular energy markets analyst states, increase in interest in diesel and gasoline might well decrease significantly, in the event the government subsidizes organizations distributing biofuels as well as additional pushes in promoting the utilization of eco-friendly fuel.

There are lots of nations around the world that are certainly active in the continuing development of biofuels. There’s Brazil, which is our planet’s largest manufacturer of ethanols produced from all kinds of sugar. It creates around three and a half billion gallons of ethanol each year. The U. S., whilst being the planet’s biggest gas-guzzler, is by now the second biggest manufacturer of biofuels after Brazil.

The E.U.’s biodiesel processing capabilities is now well over four million (metric) tonnes. 80 percent of the E.U.’s biodiesel fuels are was based on rapeseed oil; soybean oil and a small amount of palm oil constitute the remaining 20 percent.

Ben is a life-long researcher and educationalist whose passion is finding accessible means of alternative energy. He loves nothing more than to pass on his findings in an easy to read format via his blog at http://www.solarenergysavingsfacts.com.

Article Source:
http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Ben_F_Chamberlain

Biofuels Score Big But Can They Cut Oil Imports?

Biofuels have stormed forward with a series of advances that could give the sometimes maligned alternative energy sector a major boost.

On the federal side, President Obama has allocated $ 510 million to produce the fuel for military jets and ships and commercial vehicles. And the Army has established the Energy Initiatives Office Task Force, which is charged with figuring out how to meet a 25 percent renewable energy goal by 2025.

A national security issue

Much of the task force’s efforts could be directed to biofuels. Oil dependence has long been considered a national security issue. A 2006 report by the Council on Foreign Relations said the United States must manage the consequences of unavoidable dependence on foreign oil. “The longer the delay, the greater will be the subsequent trauma,” the report said.

In mid August 2011, Obama emphasized the importance of biofuels to energy security, and Navy Secretary Ray Mabus said, “America’s long-term national security depends upon a commercially viable domestic biofuels market.”

But it won’t be easy. Obama’s plan is to produce 36 billion gallons of biofuel by 2022, with 20 billion gallons coming from advanced biofuels, 15 billion gallons from corn ethanol and one billion gallons from biodiesel.

Biofuel targets by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for 2012 are about 9 percent greater than the previous year and show a modest but increasing role for non-corn biofuels. The Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 requires that a percentage of fuel sold in the country contain a minimum volume of renewable fuel.

What exactly is biofuel?

Biofuel is a pretty broad category that includes ethanol, biodiesel, cellulosic ethanol, gas-tank-ready isobutanol and, depending on how it’s classified, algae fuel. But biofuel manufacture requires energy and, like petroleum products and coal, burning it creates greenhouse gases. Similar to natural gas, those emissions aren’t as bad, but the distinction marks its green credentials with an asterisk.

Ethanol, which remains a widely used gasoline additive, may have lost some of the momentum it had five years ago, especially that derived from corn. However, research and development appear undeterred.

At the U.S. Department of Energy’s BioEnergy Science Center in Oak Ridge, Tenn., a team of researchers at believe they have “pinpointed the exact, single gene that controls ethanol production capacity in a microorganism.” The discovery, officials say, could prove the missing link in developing biomass crops that produce higher concentrations of ethanol at lower costs.

“This discovery is an important step in developing biomass crops that could increase yield of ethanol, lower production costs and help reduce our reliance on imported oil,” said Energy Secretary Steven Chu in a statement.

New biofuel discoveries

Further underlining my premise for acceleration in biofuel development is yet another announcement from the DOE, this time about two promising biofuel production methods. Both are referred to as “drop-in” biofuels technologies because they can directly replace or be used in lieu of gasoline, diesel and jet fuel without alteration to engines.

The National Advanced Biofuels Consortium, which received $ 35 million from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act to accelerate biofuel development, selected the “technology pathways” for extra attention.

The consortium plans to develop the technologies to a “pilot-ready” stage over the next two years. One of the two methods focuses on converting biomass into sugars that can be biologically and chemically converted into a renewable diesel and is dubbed FLS, for fermentation of lignocellulosic sugars. The second, catalysis of lignocellulosic sugars, or CLS, focuses on converting biomass into sugars that can be chemically and catalytically converted into gasoline and diesel fuel.

Speed is important, partners needed

“Biofuels are an important part of reducing America’s dependence on foreign oil and creating jobs here at home,” Obama said, adding that the job requires partnering with the private sector to speed development.

Officials said that to accelerate the production of bio-based jet and diesel fuel for military purposes, Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack, Secretary of Energy Steven Chu and Secretary of the Navy Mabus have developed a plan to jointly construct or retrofit several drop-in biofuel plants and refineries.

Oil remains the dominant player

The United States relies on imported oil for 49 percent of its fuel supply, but about half of that comes from the Western Hemisphere with Canada at the top with 25 percent, followed by Venezuela’s 10 percent and Mexico’s 9 percent, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. Some 12 percent of the nation’s imports come from Saudi Arabia.

And while U.S. dependence on imported oil has declined since peaking in 2005, the cause can be traced to the recession, improvements in efficiency and various changes in consumer behavior, the EIA says. “At the same time, increased use of domestic biofuels (ethanol and biodiesel), and strong gains in domestic production of crude oil and natural gas plant liquids expanded domestic supplies and reduced the need for imports,” officials say.

Undoubtedly that biofuel percentage will rise. The next decade will be the test.

Mike Nemeth, project manager of the San Joaquin Valley Clean Energy Organization, spent 24 years working as a newspaperman editing and reporting from Alaska to California. The SJVCEO is a nonprofit dedicated to improving quality of life through increased use of clean and alternative energy. The SJVCEO is based in Fresno, Calif. and works with cities and counties and public and private organizations to demonstrate the benefits of energy efficiency and renewable energy throughout the eight-county region of the San Joaquin Valley. For more information, go to http://www.sjvcleanenergy.org.

Article Source:
http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Mike_Nemeth